SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 313

LAKSHMAIAH
Mohd. Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Syed Raheemuddin – Respondent


LAKSHMAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants having lost before both the courts below preferred this appeal under section 100 of thecode of Civil Procedure, aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29th August 1975, passed by the Additional Chief Judge (Temporary) City Civil Court Hyderabad jn A. S. No. 198 of 1973, whereby the learned Judge dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment and decree dated 25-9-1973 passed in O. S. No. 246 of 1968.

( 2 ) THE suit giving rise to the above Second Appeal was instituted by the respondent herein against the 1st appellant for declaration of his title to and for recovery of possession of the mulgi bearing No, 1-6-260/2 situate at Agapura, Hyderabad and for damages for the use and occupation.

( 3 ) THE case for the plaintiff is that the plaint schedule property originally belonged to one by name Haji Mohd. Abdul Waheb. The 1st defendant was stated to be the tenant of the said owner on a monthly rent of Rs. 12/- The respondent plaintiff purchased the property from the owner under a registered sale-deed dated 30. 10. 64. The vendor informed the 1st defendant to pay the rents to the plaintiff from 1-11-1964 onwards. As the 1st defendant did not either








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top