SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 357

S.OBUL REDDY, GANGADHARA RAO
Mullapudi Timma Raju – Appellant
Versus
Dronamaraju Venkatakrishna Rao – Respondent


GANGADHARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) - These appeals are filed by the plaintiffs against the common judgment of Venkatrama sastry, J. in Appeal Nos. 209 of 1970, 431 of 1971, 3 of 1972 and Transferred appeal No. 208 of 1974 and they are disposed of by us by a common judgment.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs filed O. S. No. 28 of 1950 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, eluru, for partition of the suit properties by metes and bounds into two shares and for allotment of one share to them, and for mesne profits. Originally they filed the suit against defendants 1 and 2. The first defendant in his written statement pleaded that the lands situate in Chilakapadu and D. Muppavaram villages where in possession of the tenants and that they were claiming occupancy rights. Thereupon, the plaintiffs impleaded the tenants as defendants 3 to 19 in the suit. During the pendency of the suit the 1st defendant sold the suit properties to the defendants 3 to 52. Consequently the plaintiffs amended the plaint stating that the sales in their favour were subject to the doctrine of lis pendens, that those properties, also had to be partitioned along with the other properties, and that they were entitled for a decree against













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top