K.MADHAVA REDDY
BIRUDAVOLU RAMACHANDRA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL REVENUE DIVISIONAL, OFFICER, L. R. , NELLORE – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two revision petitions are by the declarants in C. C. Nos. 1246/76 kvr and 1277/75 KVR on the file of the Land Reforms Tribunal (Kavali division), Kavali, and are directed against the common order in A. C. Nos. 671 and 672 of 1976 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Nellore.
( 2 ) THE petitioner in C. R. P. No. l369/77 (who is hereinafter referred to as the 1st petitioner ) is the father of the petitioner in C. R. P. No. 1370/77. They filed two separate declarations and in each of these cases, the Land Reforms tribunal determined that they are holding 0. 7649 standard holding in excess of the ceiling area to which they are respectively entitled. The petitioners bad pleaded that the lands covered by the registered sale-deeds, Exs. x-3 and x-4 dated 24-6-1971, Exs. A-1 and A-2 dated 1-5-1972, and Ex. A-4 dated 2-5-1972 should be excluded form the holding of the petitioners family units. The tribunals rejected the petitioners plea, mainly on the ground that they are subsequent to 24-1-1971 and were to be disregarded under Section 7 (1) of the A. P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 or they were to be disregarded
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.