SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 396

K.MADHAVA REDDY
BIRUDAVOLU RAMACHANDRA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL REVENUE DIVISIONAL, OFFICER, L. R. , NELLORE – Respondent


K. MADHAVA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revision petitions are by the declarants in C. C. Nos. 1246/76 kvr and 1277/75 KVR on the file of the Land Reforms Tribunal (Kavali division), Kavali, and are directed against the common order in A. C. Nos. 671 and 672 of 1976 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Nellore.

( 2 ) THE petitioner in C. R. P. No. l369/77 (who is hereinafter referred to as the 1st petitioner ) is the father of the petitioner in C. R. P. No. 1370/77. They filed two separate declarations and in each of these cases, the Land Reforms tribunal determined that they are holding 0. 7649 standard holding in excess of the ceiling area to which they are respectively entitled. The petitioners bad pleaded that the lands covered by the registered sale-deeds, Exs. x-3 and x-4 dated 24-6-1971, Exs. A-1 and A-2 dated 1-5-1972, and Ex. A-4 dated 2-5-1972 should be excluded form the holding of the petitioners family units. The tribunals rejected the petitioners plea, mainly on the ground that they are subsequent to 24-1-1971 and were to be disregarded under Section 7 (1) of the A. P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 or they were to be disregarded










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top