SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 371

MADHAVA REDDY
Basireddy – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. represented by the Special Tahsildar ,. L. R. Sangareddy. – Respondent


MADHAVA REDDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition by the declarants in C. C. Nos. 2266/s/75 and 2267/s/75 on the file of the Land Reforms Tribunal, Sangareddy is directed against the order of the Land Reforms Appellate tribunal, Hyderabad in L. R. A. No. 534 of 1976.

( 2 ) THE 1st petitioner is the father of the 2nd petitioner, the major married daughter and the 3rd petitioner is stated to be the illatom son-in-law of the 1st petitioner. The 1st petitioner claimed that he had taken the 3rd petitioner as the illatom son-in-law agreeing to give him a half share of his properties and giving the 2nd petitioner in marriage to him. Accordingly, the 1st petitioner filed a declaration and the 2nd and the 3rd petitioners filed separate declarations claiming that they have a half share in the properties standing in the name of the 1st petitioner. In support of their claim, they filed the illatom agreement dated 5-1-1960 marked as Ex. A. 1 and the voters list for the years 1970 and 1966 respectively marked as Exs. A2 and A. 3 in which the 3rd petitioner is shown as residing in the same house as that of the 1st petitioner and the 2nd petitioner in the village of the 1st petitioner. The petitione













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top