K. MADHAVA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiff in O. S. 15 of 1966 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tenali has preferred this appeal. The plaintiff, who is the daughter of one Kantam Raju Seetharamaiah, seeks a declaration that the settlement deed dated 5-8-1957 executed by her father in favour of the 2nd defendant, her step-mother, and the sale deed dated 22-6-1959 in respect of A and A-1 schedule properties are not binding on her in so far as they relate to her 1/3rd and alternatively her 1/4th share therein. She also seeks a decree for partition of plaint A Schedule immovable properties into four equal shares and for partition of plaint A and A-1 immovable properties; and for partition of B, C, and D Schedule properties, which comprise an insurance policy, movable properties and outstandings, and allotment of a 1/3rd and alternatively a 1/4th share in the said properties to her.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff and defendants 2 and 3 are the daughters of Seetharamaiah by his first wife, Venkayamma. The 1st defendant, who is the second wife, leased out the properties to the 4th defendant. It is the case of the plaintiff that A schedule properties belonged to Seetharamaiah, while A-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document