SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(AP) 11

ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI
Purohit Lakshmanchandji – Appellant
Versus
Vetcha Venkata Sree Ramachandra Murty – Respondent


ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent herein filed a suit against the appellant O. S. No. 1000/71, District Munsifs Court. Rajamundry, for eviction and recovery of possession of a building at Rajamundry. His case was that the defendant was his tenant and that plaintiff issued a notice on 24-9-1971 asking the defendant to quit the premises on or before 31-10-1971. As the building was constructed after 16-7-1957, the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act will not apply. The defendant contended that the building was constructed before 1957 and hence the proper remedy of the plaintiff was to file an eviction petition under Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act and the suit was not maintainable. Even though the plaintiff had issued the notice to quit, he had accepted the rent from the date on 3-11-1971 and 3-12-1971 and subsequently. In these circumstances the said acceptance operated as waiver of the notice to quit.

( 2 ) THE learned District Munsif held that the Building was constructed after 1957 and hence the Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act was not applicable. The notice to quit was valid and








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top