SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(AP) 46

A.SAMBASIVA RAO, ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, LAKSHMAIAH
Additional Commissioner of Incometax , A. P. , Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Durga Pandarinath Tuljayya and Co. , Hyderabad – Respondent


SAMBASIVA RAO, ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, J.

( 1 ) IS there an occasion to introduce the doctrine of mens rea into section 271 (1) (a) read with sub-clause (i) of that section of the indian Income-tax Act, 1961 Seeking an answer to this question, these four writ appeals have been directed by Chinnappa reddy and Jeevan Reddy, JJ. ,to be placed before Full Bench.

( 2 ) IT is not necessary for answering the question and also forthe adjudication of the four appeals before us to go into the facts in minute detail. Broadlystated, the material facts are The respondents are assessees which are firms. They failed to file their returns for the years 1965-66 to l969-70 within the time prescribed under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). An explanation was tendered for this delay saying that the person who was in charge of the accounts of the firms was unable to look after the affairs of the firms for sometime owing to some personal reasons. The income-tax Officer was not inclined to accept this explanation and levied penalties for late submission of the returns. The respondents preferred revision petitions before the Commissioner of Incometax. Before him, the reason

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top