SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(AP) 61

V.MADHAVA RAO
S. Rajyalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
S. Sitamahalakshmi – Respondent


V. MADHAVA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order passed by the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dated 22nd day of April 1975, overruling the objections raised bye the judgment-debtor and directing the decree-holders to take further proceedings in the execution petition.

( 2 ) IT was contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that without obtaining a succession certificate, the respondent could not proceed with the execution of the decree. To understand the above contention, it is necessary to state the brief facts which are as under :

( 3 ) THE respondent filed O. S. No. 6/1973 before the Chief Judge, City Civil Court Hyderabad, for partition of the suit schedule properties. A preliminary decree was passed on 31-7-1973 and costs were awarded to the plaintiff against the lst defendant. On 5-3-1974 the sole plaintiff died and his legal representatives were brought on record on 2-9-1974. Thereafter, E. P No. 5/1975 was filed on 9-3-1975. The judgment-debtor filed a counter-affidavit in E. P. No. 5/75 stating therein that the decree-holder died in 1974 after passing of the preliminary decree. The legal representative, i. e. the present petitioner cannot







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top