( 1 ) THE revision petition is directed against the judgement passed by the district Revenue Officer, Hyderabad in case No. E4/32170/70 dated 4-5-1971 allowing the appeal and setting aside the order passed by the Tahsildar, Hyderabad urban in file No. A3/1988/69 dated 29-8-1970.

( 2 ) THE petitioner claims to be the protected tenant and he was given a tenancy certificate. He contends that the respondents filed a petition before the Revenue Divisional Officer for the cancellation of the tenancy certificate issued in favour of the petitioner. But their application was dismissed. Aggrieved by that order, they preferred an appeal before the Joint Collector, that appeal was also dismissed. Against that order, the\ preferred revision petition in the High Court. But that was also dismissed. But the respondents unlawfully and forcibly disposes- sed the petitioner on 30-1-1969. Hence he filed a petition which was registered as A3/1988/69 before the Tahsildar under section 32 (1) of the Tenancy Act for restoration of his possession by evicting the respondents. The respondents before the Tahsildar contested the application. They contended that the petitioner was never in possessio