SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(AP) 119

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Fatima Sultana Begum – Appellant
Versus
J. Eashwarprasad – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred by the 6th defendant in o. S. No. 18 of 1962 on the file of the learned Chief. udge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, against the order dated 14-12-1973 dismissing I A No. 2179 of 1973 filed by the appellant, as not maintainable in law. It is necessary to state a few facts for appreciating the question at issue.

( 2 ) ONE Sajid Yar Jung died leaving a will, where under he bequeathed 1/3 interest in his properties in favour of respondents 15 to 21 in this appeal. He had two sons, namely, (i) Kazim Nawaz Jung respondent No. 21 and (ii) askar Nawag Jung (the predecessor-in interest of respondents 23 to 34) Respondents 43 to 47 are the daughters of the deceased while respondents 35 to 42 are his creditors. Respondents 1 and 2 are the joint receivers appointed in the said suit by the Court below, while respondents to 1,4 are the purchasers of a building known as "woodcock Hall" at ooty. The appellant herein is one of the daughters of the deceased, who was impleaded as defendant No. 6 in the suit.

( 3 ) O. S. NO. 18/1962 was an administration suit filed under Or. XX, R. 13, cpc. A preliminary decree was passed on 11-3-1















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top