SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(AP) 118

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Shaik Buddan Sab – Appellant
Versus
Nagamma – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS are the appellants. The trial Court has decreed the respondent: suit as prayed for, granting a decree in a sum of Rs. 23,730/ with costs, towards damages for breach of warranty.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff, defendants 1 and 2, and one Kothapalli rahmansab (husband of the 3rd defendant and father of defendants 5 to 6) sold a land with an extent of Ac. 12-97 cents under a registered sale-deed dated 7-6-1947, to the 1st plaintiff for a consideration of Rs, 500/- representing that they are the full and absolute owners thereof. They delivered possession of the same on the date cf the sale- deed. Subsequently, the mother of defendants 1 and 2 filed a suit. O. S. No. 407/1952 on the file of the District munsif s Court, Cuddapah, against the 1st plaintiff herein, contending that the present defendants 1 and 2 or the deceased Kothapalli rahmansab, had title only to the extent of 6 Acres out of the land conveyed by them and that, the remaining extent ie. , Ac. 6. 97 cents, was the property of her husband, V. Chinna Peeran Sab, who is said to have executed three gift-deeds in respect of the said Ac, 6-97 cents in favour of herself and her two daughters



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top