SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(AP) 248

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.MADHAVA REDDY
Kishwari Begum – Appellant
Versus
Quadiri Begum – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) CIVIL Miscellaneous Appeal Nos. 192/1973, 84 of 1974 and 119 of 1976 were disposed of by a Bench consisting of Sri S. Obul Reddi, C. J. , and one of us (Jeevan Reddy, J.) under the judgment and decree dated 17-3 1976. All the three C. M. As. were allowed and certain directions were given by this Court. The main idea behind the several directions given, was that there should be a re-survey of the entire extent of land in possession of each of the share-holders (appellants in C. M. A. No. 192/73 and 8 /1974) after notice to all the concerned parties, for determining the excess land, if any, in possession of each such shareholder, as per the terms of the compromise decree passed by this Court in C. C. C. A. No. 7 of 1957 and A. S. No. 52 of 1956, dated 29-4-1960. If any excess was to be found, the same was to be delivered into the possession of Smt. Ahmedibegum and Smt. Khadri Begum in accordance with the said compromise decree. To enable the survey to be carried out at an early date and without any undue delay, this court directed the parties to deposit certain amounts towards the cost of the said survey. Direction No. (2) (hereinafter referred to as clause (2)






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top