ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, J.

( 1 ) IN these four revision petitions the only question for consideration is what is the Court fee payable on the plaint. Suits were filed in different Courts by different parties. But the defendant in each case is the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board. O. S. 59/71 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad West which has given rise to C. R. P. 2157/75 is a suit for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from disconnecting the electricity service of the plaintiff. C. R. P. No. 59/76 arises out of suit O. S. 250/74 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Visakhapatnam for a declaration that a notice issued by the Assistant Engineer of the Defendant Board is illegal and for a consequential injunction restraining the defendant from disconnecting the supply of service. Similarly O. S. 1324/74 on the file of the District Munsifs Court Visakhapatnam has given rise to C. R. P. No. 49/76 which is a suit for declaring that notice of disconnection is illegal and for a mandatory injunction directing the restoration of supply to the Plaintiffs establishment. Lastly O. S. 232/74 on the file of the District Munsifs Court, Visakhapatnam which corre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document