A gift of immovable property by a Hindu after the coming into force of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, can only be effected by a registered instrument signed by or on behalf of the donor and attested by at least two witnesses.

K. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J.

( 1 ) IN this revision petition filed under section 21 of the Andhra pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings, Act, 1973, it is contended that the two items of land given by th- petitioner to his daughters towards Pasupukumkuma at the times of their marriages in 1966 and 1967 should be e eluded from his holdings. Both the Tribunals below rejected this contention, firstly on the ground that the partition list Ex. A 12 and the subsequent partition deed Ex. A. 13 dated 7-10-1971 executed between the petitioner and his son do not show as to what lands were given to the petitioner s, daughters and that P. W. 2, the son-in-law of the petitioner stated that the land revenue was being paid by the donees only from 1973. The Tribunals also held that even if the said gifts were true. they were only oral gifts and that in the absence of any registered document, the donees did not acquire any title to the lands gifted and that it was not con tended that the donees had acquired any title by adverse possession by more than 12 years prior to I -1 1975.

( 2 ) IT is contended by Sri M. Chaudrasekhar Rao that the partition list and the partition deed and the other oral evidence establish the truth of the gifts But the Tribunals finding is one of fact anil cannot be interfered with in revision.

( 3 ) EVEN otherwise, as rightly held by the Tribunals below, in the absence of any r- gistered deeds of gift, the donees would not acquire any title. Sri Chandrasekhara Rao sought to contend that under Hindu Law, a gift of immovable property to a daughter at the time of her marriage towards Pasupu Kumkuma is valid even in the absence of a registered document.

( 4 ) IN support of this contention, he has drawn my attention to a passage in "hindu Law Principles and Precedents" by N. R. Raghavachariar and also three rulings in Smt. Kamla Devi and Another vs. Bachupal gupta and others (1) A. I. R. 1957 Supreme Court 434. , Serandaya Pillai and another (2) 1959 (11) Manras Law Journal 502 and Madan Pillai vs Badrakali Ammal and Another (3) A. I. R. 1922 Madras 369. ,. In the last of the cases, it was held that a transfer of land of the value of more than Rs. 100/- by a husband to his wife to be enjoyed by her during her life-time in discharge of her claim to future maintenance could be made without writing. The learned judge held that the transaction there did not amount to a gift or exchange or sale and therefore, the transfer there was not required be in writing. In SMT. Kamla Devi and another Vs. Bachupal Gupta And Others (1) A. I. R. 1957 Supreme court 434, it was observed in paragraph 20 that it is the imperative religious duty and moral obligation of a father mother or other guardian to give a girl in marriage to a suitable husband-and that gifts by a widow of landed property to her daughter or son-in law on the occasion of marriage or any ceremonies connected with the marriage are well-recognised in Hindu law and if a promise is made of a gift, such a promise may be fulfilled afterwards and that a gift made long after the marriage may be supported on the ground that the gift when made fulfils that moral and religious obligation. But the above observations only show that a Hindu widow has power to make an alienation of a reasonable port ion of her husoand s estate in favour of the daughter as marriage dowry. But that does not mean that a gift of a immovable property could be made without a registered document section 123 of the TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 clearly lays down that for pur. poses of making a gift of immovable property, the transfer must beeffected by a registered instrument signed by or OB behalf of the donor and attested atleast by two witnesses. Therefore, while under the personal law of hindus, a gift can be effected by a widow at the time of the marriage of a daughter, . he ?ift of the landed property can only be effected in the manner laid down bv section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act. Furth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document