SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 32

A.V.KRISHNA RAO
Pulapaka Lalitha – Appellant
Versus
Avasarala Atchuta Ranganayakamma – Respondent


A. V. KRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 74 of 1963 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate judge, kakinada. The suit was filed for declaration of the plaintiff s right to the plaint A, B and C schedule properties, for partition of the A and C schedule properties into four equal shares and allotment of one share to the plaintiff to divide the B schedule property into four shares and allot to the plaintiff one share. A direction was also sought to direct the 2nd defendant to pay the plaintiff her share in all the amounts collected by the 2nd defendant from the deferidancs with interest,

( 2 ) ONE Avasarala Acchanna Pantulu, here in after called pantulu , was an employee of the 14th defendant - Standard Vaccum Oil Company Ltd. , now called ESSO. He died en 29-5-1960 at kakinsda undivided with his son, the 3rd defendant. The plaintiff and the 3rd defendant are the children of Pantulu by his deceased first: wife, Pantulu s mother is the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant is the Second wife of Pantulu. The 15th defendant is the plaintiff s junior paternal uncle. The 11th defendant is the father of the 2nd defendant and also the son-in-law of the 1s









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top