SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 76

A.SAMBASIVA RAO, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Srinivasa Kandasari Sugars, Narasimhunipet – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition is for the issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction declaring the sale of the petition-schedule properties by the Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, i. e. , the 2nd respondent, under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 in favour of the 4th Respondent, as unconstitutional, illegal and void, and the same came up for hearing before one of us (Sambasiva Rao, J. , as he then was ). During the course of the arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner questioned the constitutional validity of the Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, hereinafter referred to as "the Act", and as the same has to be heard by a Division Bench, the writ petition was directed to be posted before a Bench and accordingly it has come up before us.

( 2 ) THE essential facts for appreciating the contentions on behalf of the petitioner, may briefly be stated. The writ petition schedule properties consisting of both movable and immovable properties, which are necessary for the purpose of maintaining the Khandasi Sugar factory situated at Narasmhunipeta, Bobbili Taluk, belonged to Sri Venugopal Khan






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top