SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 93

A.GANGADHARA RAO
T. V. Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Turgakamala Devi – Respondent


A. GANGADHARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) IN these two petitions, an important question of law is raised with regard to remand and bail during the course of Police investigation. One petition is filed by the State and another by the father of the deceased to cancel the bail granted to A. I. to A. 4 on 3-5-1975 by the Judical Second Class magistrate, Chirala.

( 2 ) THE brief facts leading up to the filing of these two petitions may be stated:- A. I. is the wife of the deceased. A, 2 is the father of A. I. and A. 3 and A. 4 are the sons of A 2. A preliminary charge sheet under section 302 read with section 34 I. P. C. and 201 read with sec. 34 i. P. C. was filed by the Inspector of police, Crime Branch, C. I. D. Hyderabad. on 3-5-1975 in the court of the Judicial magistrate of Second Class Chirala. In that charge sheet. It is stated that all the four accused caused the death of the deceased on the night of 5-1-1975 and in order to cause disappearance of the evidence, hese four accused with the assistance of some other persons removed the dead body in a cart and threw it m a canal. The dead body was discovered at about 9 or 10 a m. on the next day. In order to cover up her guilt, A. I. invented a s




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top