SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 89

LAKSHMAIAH
Mirza – Appellant
Versus
K. Balaklstaiah – Respondent


LAKSHMAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the defendants directed against the judgment and decree of the learned V Additional judge. City civil Court, Hyderabad dated March 17, 1972 by which the suit instituted by the respondents herein was decreed.

( 2 ) THE suit was filed to put the respondents in vacant possession of the premises 12-5-920 to 925 including Damdama situated at Charminar Chowk Maidan khan Hyderabad evicting the appellants and to pass a decree for an amount of Rs. 2,863-25 Ps. as compensation for use and occupation and for future compensation from the date of the suit till the date of delivery of possession.

( 3 ) THE facts of the case necessary for the disposal of this appeal may briefly be staged. The plaintiffs are the owners of the premises in question. The 1st defendant obtained from the plaintiffs father the premises in question by executing a rental deed dated 26th October, 1959 on a monthly rent of Rs. 300/- for running a hotel known as Minar Cafe That rental deed was for a period of 11 months. Subsequent to the expiration of that period, the 1st defendant continued in possession as tenant on the same terms and conditions by paying rents to the father of the



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top