SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 136

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU, PUNNAIAH
Veera Venkata Satyanarayan Rice Mill Accused, represented by Its Proprietor. K. Ramdas – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


PUNNAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two petitions are directed against the orders passed by the district and Sessions Judge, West godavarl at Eluru before whom appeals were preferred under Section 6-C of the essential Commodities Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) making over criminal Appeal Nos. 65/1974 and 84/ 1974 from his file to the file of the additional Sessions judge, Eluru.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the learned Additional Sessions Judge Is not competent to hear and dispose of the appeals under Section 6-C of the Act, he, therefore, requests this Court to retransfer the appeals to the file of the district and Sessions, Judge, Eluru from the file of the Additional Sessions judge.

( 3 ) THE question whether the additional Sessions judge is competent to hear and dispose of the appeals under section 6-C of the Act was decided by our learned brother Chlnnappa Reddy, J,. in L. Ramayya vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (I) 1972-1 An. W. R. 118. The learned judge held that whether the District and Sessions Judge acts as a Court or persona deslgnata, the Additional Sessions judge Is Incompetent to hear an appeal preferred to the District and Sessions judge under Section 6-C of the Act




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top