SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 147

MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Ustapalli Krishna Murthy Setty – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE only question that arises for consideration in this revision is whether a dealer in fertilisers can store the fertilisers at any place of his choice. Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, the learned counsel for the petisioner contends that there is no provition in the Fertiliser Control Order, 1957 requiring a dealer in fertilisers to store the fertilisers at any specified place. The relevant provision is clause 5 (1) of the Fertiliser Control order ,1957 which reads:" Subject to the provisions of clause 5, no person shall carry on the business of selling fertiliser at any place except under and in accordance with the terms and conditions of certificate of registration granted to him under this order : Provided that licences. "what is contended by Sri Padmanabha reddy is that the clause contemplates a specified place only for carrying on the business of selling the fertilisers and does not take in its ambit the place of storage of the fertilisers. In support of this submission, he draws the attention of the Court to the terms and conditions of certificate of registration enumerated in the prescribed Form B under which a certificate of registration to carry on the business as a dealer



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top