SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 146

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, VISWANATHA SASTRY
Achuta Yellamandaiah – Appellant
Versus
Kurakulakshmamma – Respondent


VENKATRAMA SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of an administration suit. A. S. 179/72 is preferred by plaintiffs 1 and 3 to 5. A. S. 752/72 is preferred by defendants 29 to 32.

( 2 ) ONE Kuraka Subbarayudu died on 16-3-1968 leaving behind him defendants 1 and 2, his wives and defendants 5 to 9 his sons and daughters. He has left a large estate which is shown in A-schedule property which consists of immovable and B-schedule movable properties. Originally the suit was filed by five plaintiffs who re creditors of Subbarayudu. As the 2nd plaintiff died plaintiffs 6 to 12 were added as his legal representatives. The 1st plaintiff obtained a decree for Rs. 6,000. 00 and odd and costs on 30-10-1970 under ex. A-1 against Subbarayulu and other defendants and his heirs. Similarly the 3rd plaintiff obtained a decree for Rs. 4,000/ and odd plus costs on 30-8-1968 under Ex. A-18. The 4th plaintiff also obtained similar decree for Rs. 10,223-76 on 30-6-1971 vide Ex. A-14. The 5th plaintiff lent a sum of Rs. 3,000. 00 on a promissory note dated 7-7-1967 which has been marked as Ex. A-7. There are two payments made on 4-1-1968 and 7-4-1968 of Rs. 1000. 00 each of which have been separate





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top