SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 142

S.MADHUSUDAN RAO
Nakkati Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


S. MADHUSUDAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE two petitioners are the first and the second accused in P. R. C. No, 4 of 1975 on the file of the II Additional judicial First Class Mrgistrate s Court, amalapuram. They were remanded to judicial custody along with five others on 30-5-1975 on the ground that they were concerned in Cr. No. 140/75 of the munmidivaram Police Station which is a case registered under Secs. 364, 342, 302, and 201 r. w. Sec 34 I. P. C. While the investigation was proceeding they were being remanded to judicial custody from time to time. As no charge-sheet was filed even by 4th August, 75, they submitted an application under Crl. M. P. No. 296/75 before the Magistrate requesting that they may be released on bail in so far as their custody pending investigation exceeded 60 days by then. They stated in the application that they were ready to furnish ball and that they were prepared tj abide by any conditions that might be imposed by the Court. The learned Magistrates adjourred the petitlo for leading on 7-8-75. While so, the police filed a charge sheet against the petitioners and others on 6-8-75 and the learned Magistrate took cognizance of offences u/s. 364, 342, 302 and 201









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top