SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 187

LAKSHMAIAH
V. Rajeswaramma – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Municipal Corporation – Respondent


LAKSHMAIAH, J.

( 1 ) 1. The petitioner purchased a piece of land measuring 406 square yards at King koti road, Hyderabad in the year 1971 from H. E. H the Nizam. She gave a notice dated 13-4-1971 to the Commissioner (the respondent herein) intimating her intention to construct five mulgees with a stair-case and the same was got accompanied by a plan. A stair-case was proposed on the front side abutting the road and a residential house was proposed on the rear side On 17-4-1971 the Commissioner addressed a letter to the petitioner stating that the land in question forms fart of King Koti premises which has been subdivided into different portions without any approval of the Corporation in lerms of Section 388 of the Hyderabad municipal Corporations Act, 1955 (herein after referred merely as the act ). The permission is therefore refused and the plans were returned. The petitioner thereupon re-submitted the plans on 17-1-1972 stating that the site abuts on two roads where all amenities are existing and several buildings have been constructed and as such Section 388 does not apply to the facts of the case. The Commissioner did not communicate either his approval or disapproval within














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top