SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 234

ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Kuchi Rajeswara Sastry and Sons. , rep. by Kuchi Sambasiva Rao, Partner Ambajipet – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Kakinada – Respondent


ALLADL KUPPUSWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THE common question chat arises for consideration in these writ petitions is whether copra was liable to sales-tax during the relevant assessment year at the point of last purchase in the State under Item 5 of Schedule III of the andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (referred to in this judgment as the Act) read with sec. 6 of the Act. Though the petitioners and the assessment years are different In the three writ petitions, it is admitted that the decision In one of them will govern the other writ petitions. Hence, it is sufficient to set out the facts and contentions in W P No 3447/73.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a dealer In copra and cocount oil at Ambajipet, East godavari District. He purchases copra from registered dealers and converts it into oil. During the assessment years 1964-65 to 1967-68. tax was levied on the purchases made by him on copra on the ground that the purchase was the last purchase within the State and tax schedule III consists of several items. the following terms : was liable at that point: on copra under item 5 of schedule III of the Act read with Sec 6 of the Act. These assess ments were confirmed on appeal by Assistant comm










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top