VISWANATHA SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS are the appellents in this second appeal, which arises out of their suit for maintenance instituted against the respondents herein and their putative father Alluri Ramachandra Venkata krishna Rao. impleaded as the first defendent In the suit, In the following circumstances:-

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFS claimed to be the illegitimate sons of the first defendant, having been born respectively on 10-6-1960 and 26-8-1963. Their mother was the permanent concubine of the first defendant. Second defendant Is the wife of the first defendant while the other defendants are their children. After the birth of the first plaintiff, the second defendant and the father of the first defendant made the first defendant to execute a settlsmen deed on 30-6-61 (Ex. B-9) in favour of defendants 3 to 7, in respect of plaint A Schedule properties and Item I of the B Schedule. The first defendant alone contln ed In possession of these properties. He execused an agreement on 4-3-1964 agreeing tc give 80 cents of the land to the plaintiff s mother and also pay maintenance to the plaintiffs at the rate of rs. 50/- each and to provide for their education. Since M:y 1967 the first defe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document