SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(AP) 261

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Emana Veeraraghavamma – Appellant
Versus
Gudiseva Subbarao – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is preferred with leave against the judgment of A. D. V. Reddy, J, allowing the Second Appeal with costs

( 2 ) ONE Nanduri Nagayya owning an extent of Ac. 1-91 cents of land (mentioned in the plaint A schedule) dies on 26-7-1961 leaving behind him his wife Veeramma and two daughters. Emana Veeraraghavamma (plaintiff) and Gudiseva Subbamma whose husband Gudiseva Subbarao is impleaded as first defendant to the suit. On 22-3-1966. Nanduri Veeramma executed a gift deed Ex. B-4 giving the said extent of Ac. 1-91 cent to her two daughters in equal shares i. e. Giving each 95 1/2 cents. Obviously, she executed the said gift-deed on the assumption that she was the absolute owner of the said total extent and she purported to gift the same to her daughters equally. Gudiseva Subbamma was married in another village Kanchadam whereas her parents were the residents of Kanchakodur. She sold the said 95 1/2 cents under Ex. B-5 dated 2-4-1966 in favour of one Venkatappiah for a consideration of Rs. 3,000 and adding another sum of Rs. 1,000 and stamp and registration charges form her husbands estate, purchased the suit property of an extent of Ac. 2-5







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top