SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(AP) 1

KODANDA RAMAYYA
V. LAKSHMANASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
PERSONAL ASST. COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM – Respondent


KONDIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, by the petitioner is to quash the order of the Personal Assistant to the Collector, srikakulam in his D. Dis. 9222/68 dated September 23, 1969 revising the order of the Assistant Collector, Srikakulam dated 22-5-1968 appointing the petitioner as the Village Munsif of Sariapalli. Tekkali taluk, Srikakulam district.

( 2 ) THE proposals to fill the vacancy of the Village Munsif of Sariapalli, tekkali taluh, in the District of Snkakulam, which have arisen on account of the death of B. Raminaidu, the Permanent Village Munsif. were sent by the Tabsildar on January 24, 1968 to the Assistant Collector. Thereafter, the Assistant Collector instructed the Tahsildar on 25-2-1968 to send up specific proposals to appoint a suitable candidate. The Tahsildar, tekkali, in his proceedings dated March 25, 1968 submitted specific proposal recommending for the appointment of the petitioner as the Village munsif for the village. The petitioner was the Sarpanch of the fame village and be submitted his resignation to the office of the Sarpanch to the District panchayat Officer who accepted the same on March 12, 1968. The Block






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top