SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(AP) 67

C.KONDAIAH, V.MADHAVA RAO
Musala Annaji Rao – Appellant
Versus
Boggarapu Papaiah Setty – Respondent


KONDAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal arising out of O. S. No. 93 of 1969 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judges Court, Kurnool and directed against the order of our learned brother, Muktadar J. dismissing at S. R. stage an application for stay of execution of the decree in the suit pending an unnumbered appeal and an application for condoning the delay in the filing of the appeal, gives rise to a short but important and interesting question of law, viz. ,"whether the Court is competent or has jurisdiction and power to grant stay of execution of the decree pending admission and registration of a regular appeal filed beyond the period of limitation provided therefor, or pending disposal of the application filed for condonation of delay in filing the appeal?"

( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the scope of the question, it is necessary to state briefly the material facts and circumstances that gave rise to it. The respondent herein Boggarapu Papaiah Setty instituted a suit, O. S. No. 93 of 1969 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kumool for recovery of a debt of Rs. 5,000. 00 on the foot of a promissory note executed by the father of the appellants herein, o



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top