SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(AP) 61

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY
Mohd. MUKARAM ALI – Appellant
Versus
KHURSRO BEGUM – Respondent


CHENNAKESAV REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition preferred by the tenant under section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) seeking to revise the order of the Chief judge, City Small Causes Court, in R. A. No. 557 of 1973, dated 27th november, 1973 upholding the order of the Principal Rent Controller, hyderabad in I. A. No. 996 of 1972.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this petition may be shortly set out. The respondents are the owners of a building consisting of four mulgies bearing municipal No. 11-6-207 situated near Public Gardens, Nampally, Hyderabad. The petitioner is a tenant in one of the mulgies. The land-ladies filed applications for eviction of the tenants on the ground that the building is required bona fide for reconstruction. Those applications were dismissed by the Rent Controller Aggrieved against the decision of the Rent Controller, the land-ladies preferred appeals which were allowed by the Chief Judge, city Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, The learned Judge also directed the land-ladies to complete the construction within a period of six months from the date the possession of th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top