A.SAMBASIVA RAO
Mohd. Burhanuddin – Appellant
Versus
Savitri Bai – Respondent
( 1 ) THE question I have to answer in these two revision petitions is whether the executing Court is bound to undo the acts and orders it has done and Passed after the Appellate Court has stayed the execution.
( 2 ) THE following circumstances are material for consideration of this question. In O. S. No. 49 of 1969 in the District Munsiffs Court, Bhainsa. there was a decree for possession passed against the present petitioner on his application, the trial Court stayed the execution of the decree under Order 41, Rule 5 (2) Civil Procedure Code till 16th of June, 1972. to enable him to approach the Appellate Court for appropriate stay orders. Accordingly, the petitioner preferred A. S. No. 12 of 1972. to the District Court. Adilabad and obtained orders of stay in I. A. No. 465 of 1972 on 16th of June, 1972. Since the stay was granted by the Court of first instance only till 16th of June, 1972, the matter was posted before that Court for execution. On that day. expecting orders of stay from the appellate Court, the Bhainsa Court adjourned the matter to 17-6-1972. That day however, no formal order was received from the Appellate Court, but the Advocate for the petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.