SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(AP) 96

A.SAMBASIVA RAO, V.MADHAVA RAO
Thammana Nukiah Shetti – Appellant
Versus
Velapa Appalaraju – Respondent


SAMBASIVA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE principal question that needs to be answered by us in this Letters Patent Appeal is, whether an auction-purchaser of the shares of two members of a family, which has undergone division in status but has not divided its assets by metes and bounds, is entitled to have mesne profits from the date of the sale in his favour.

( 2 ) THIS question arises in the appeal brought by the 2nd defendant against the judgment and decree of our learned brother Ramachandra Rao J. in A. S. No. 483 of 1970 confirming the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judges Court Visakapatnam in O. S. No. 119 of 1967. That suit was filed by the present respondent for partition of a house into seven shares and for possession of two such shares, and for past and future mesne profits on that 2/7th share. He sought past mesne profits right from the date on which he purchased the 2/7th share in the court auction on 7-7-1974. A third party had obtained a money decree against defendants 1 and 2, who are brothers, and, in execution thereof, brought their 2/7th share, i. e. , 3 residential house, to sale on 7-7-1974. The respondent purchased that share for Rs. 6,700. 00. It is said that symb


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top