SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(AP) 151

S.MADHUSUDAN RAO, S.OBUL REDDY
Panchireddi Appala Suramma alias Gadela Appalasuramma – Appellant
Versus
Gadela Ganapatlu – Respondent


S. OBUL REDDI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE short and interesting question that arises in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is whether a marriage between two minors, when the bridegroom has not completed the age of eighteen years and the bride the age of fifteen years at the time of the marriage, is no marriage in the eye of law.

( 2 ) THE facts are not in dispute. The appellant is the wife. Admittedly, she was aged about six years at the date of her marriage with the respondent, who was then eleven years old, the date of marriage being Vaisakha Bahula Pancharm in Hevilambi year (1957 ). On 6-5-1958, the father of the appellant is alleged to have executed a settlement deed conferring certain rights on the appellant and the respondent. In 1967, misunderstandings arose between the appellants father and the family of the respondent. The appellants father then turned out the respondent from his house and executed a revocation deed on 1-5-1967 purporting to revoke the settlement deed executed by him earlier on 6-5-1958. On 9-5-1967, he issued a registered notice to the respondent repudiating the marriage between the appellant and the respondent. To that, the respondent sent a reply warning the appella










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top