SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(AP) 145

A.V.KRISHNA RAO, S.OBUL REDDY
Vanguard Insurance Company Ltd. , Vijayawada – Appellant
Versus
Chellu Hanumantha Rao – Respondent


A. V. KRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE above two appeals are filed under section 110-D of the Motor vehicles Act. In eachof them the appellant is the Insurance Company. In thef irst of the appeals, the petitioner before the Accidents Claims Tribunal in O P. No. 84 of 1970 claimed Rs. 17,500/ as compensation consequent upon the death of one Chellu subbarao, as a result of an accident that took place on 4th May, 1970 on the vijayawada-Hyderabad Trunk Road when lorry A. P. T. No. 7676 beloging to the 1st respondent in the petition dashed against the cart in which he was travelling. The driver was impleaded as the 2nd respondent and the insurer was imupleaded as the 3rd respondent. Originally the petitioners were the mother and the foster-son of the deceased Subba Rao. Subsequently, during the pendency of the proceedings, the 1st petitioner (mother) died, and the 3rd petitioner was added as the legal representative of the deceased 1st petitioner. He is the brother of the deceased.

( 2 ) IN the second of the appeals arising out of O. . P No. 85 of 1970 on the file of the tribunal, the respondents were the same as in the other original petition. This claim also arose out of the same accident, b


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top