A.V.KRISHNA RAO, S.OBUL REDDY
Vanguard Insurance Company Ltd. , Vijayawada – Appellant
Versus
Chellu Hanumantha Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) THE above two appeals are filed under section 110-D of the Motor vehicles Act. In eachof them the appellant is the Insurance Company. In thef irst of the appeals, the petitioner before the Accidents Claims Tribunal in O P. No. 84 of 1970 claimed Rs. 17,500/ as compensation consequent upon the death of one Chellu subbarao, as a result of an accident that took place on 4th May, 1970 on the vijayawada-Hyderabad Trunk Road when lorry A. P. T. No. 7676 beloging to the 1st respondent in the petition dashed against the cart in which he was travelling. The driver was impleaded as the 2nd respondent and the insurer was imupleaded as the 3rd respondent. Originally the petitioners were the mother and the foster-son of the deceased Subba Rao. Subsequently, during the pendency of the proceedings, the 1st petitioner (mother) died, and the 3rd petitioner was added as the legal representative of the deceased 1st petitioner. He is the brother of the deceased.
( 2 ) IN the second of the appeals arising out of O. . P No. 85 of 1970 on the file of the tribunal, the respondents were the same as in the other original petition. This claim also arose out of the same accident, b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.