SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(AP) 18

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, A.SAMBASIVA RAO
Cheekireddy Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


CHENNAKESAVA KEDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE are petitions seekipg to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 561-A Cr. P,c. and quash the security proceedings instituted against them under Section 107 Cr. P. C. For a proper appreciation of the questions of law arising for decision in these petitions, it would be sufficient if we set out of the facts in one of the cases. For the sake of convenience, we shall set out the facts in Crl. M. P. No. 1676 of 1972. On credible information made by the Sub Inspector of Police, Vidavalur that the petitioners were likely to commit breach of peace or do a wrongful act which may probably cause breach of peace and disturb public tranquility the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kavalj was of the opinion that there was sufficient ground for proceeding against the petitioners under Section 107 cr. P. C. and issued a preliminary order under Section 112 Cr. P. C. The learned Magistrate passed this order on 29th July, 1972. By the said order the petitioners were directed to appear in person on 19-8-1972 At Kavali and show cause why everyone of them should not be ordered to execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 500/- with two sureties for a like sum each for k









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top