( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the husband, whose complaint against his wife and others for the offences under section 494 and 494 read with section 109, Indian penal Code had resulted in acquittal of the accused of the charges against them.

( 2 ) IN the complaint he alleged that on 14th May, 1966, he had married A-1, who is the daughter of A-3 at their house at China Lingala Village according to hindu Dharmasastra and thereafter she resided with him for five years and then left him, that the second marriage of A-1 with A-2 was proposed to be performed on 18th June, 1970 at 10-40 A. M. in the kanakadurga temple situated at Vijayawada, but for reasons best known to them, the venue was changed and the marriage was performed at Sri Venkateswaraswamy temple in Jamalapuram village of Madhira Taluk, that A-1 to A-3 knowing that a-1 s marriage with the complainant was not dissolved, got the second marriage of a-1 with A-2 performed without obtaining a decree for divorce and they had thereby committed an offence under section 494, Indian Penal Code, that a-4 and A-5 who were mediators at the first marriage, had organised and attended the second marriage between A-1 and a-2 and thereby they had co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document