O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Mohd Abdul Qadeeer – Appellant
Versus
Azamatullah Khan – Respondent
( 1 ) 1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this appeal. The facts which are now not in dispute are as follows : Samadani Begum borrowed a a sum of Rs. 30,000/- from the plaintiff and executed a promissory note Ex. A. 1 dated 20-12-1958 in favour of the plaintiff. She also gave a receipt Ex. A. 2 for the same amount. The receipt was attested by Abu Mohammad Abdur Rahman husband of Samdani begum. Samdani Begum died issueless on 20-6-1959. On her death, her heirs were her husband Abu Mohammed Abdur Rahman and her other kindred, defendant 1 to 5. The husband was entitled to a half share of her estate and was liable to pay, under Mohammadan Law, half the debt due to the plaintiff. Defendants 1 to 5 were similarly entitled to half the estate of Samdani Begum and were liable to pay half the debt due to the plaintiff. On 3-10-1961 Abu Mohammad Abdur Rahman made a part payment of a sum of Rs. 1000/- to the plaintiff, An endorsement of pare payment was made on the promissory note and a separate document Ex. A. 14 was also executed by which Abu Mohammed abdur Rahman acknowledgse the debt due to the plaintiff. Abu mohammad Abdur Rahman died on 12-2-1962. Defendants 6 to 8
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.