SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(AP) 90

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, GOPALRAO EKBOLE
D. Sundara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioner a member of Schedule Caste, joined the Visakhapatnam port Trust as Assistant Secretary (Class I) on 28-11-1964. After some time there seems to have developed misunderstanding between him and his superior authority. Allegations and counter allegations have been made in the petition and the counter and references are made to a series of correspondence. Nothing, however, turns upon these allegations and counter allegations. The petitioner gave a notice of resignation on 3-4-4970. It rr ads :"i heredy tender my resignation of the post of Assistant secretary in the Port Trust with three months notice. This may be taken as my notice of resignation. "

( 2 ) THE port Trust authorities accepted the same by their letter dated -41-1970 which reads as follows : " The Chirman has accepted your resignation for the post of Assistant Secretary (Class I) at this port Trust with effect from 2-7-70 A. M. " the petitioner, however, on a second thought, withdrew his resignation in the following manner under a telegram dated 9-4-1970. "schedule caste officer D. Sunder Kao, Assistant Secretary, port Visakbapatnam, harassed, victimised, compelled resign job, pray enquily, report follow

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top