SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(AP) 128

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY
Vanka Anantha Rao – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. represented by the Circle Inspector of Police ramachandrapuram, East Godavari Dist – Respondent


CHENNAKESAV REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition raises a question of law of considerable importance; viz. , whether section 6-A of the Essential Commodities act, 1955 (10 of 1955), hereinafter referred to as "the Act", excludes the jurisdiction of the Criminal Court under Sections 516-A and 523 of the Criminal Procedure Code to make an order for the disposal of essential commodity seized and produced before it for contravention of an order made under Section 3 of the Act. For a proper appreciation of the question arising in the case, it is necessary to set out the essential facts.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a retail dealer in foodgrains carrying on business at i uni Village in East Godavari District under licence granted to him by the competent authority. On 13-3-1973 he was transporting 94 bags of rice, each bag weighing 96 Kgs in a lorry bearing registration no. A P. A 1411 to Tuni. On the way the lorry was intercepted by the Circle Inspector of Police Ramachandrapuram, at Ramavaram junction and the rice bags were seized by him as they were being transported without a permit or licence, in contravention of the Andhra pradesh Rice and Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1970. Th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top