SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(AP) 131

A.GOPAL RAO, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Y. V. Hanumantha Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. R. Pattabhiram – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, C. J.

( 1 ) WE have an application before us requesting to punish the respondents for contempt. It arises in the following circumstances.

( 2 ) THE petitioner herein filed a Writ Petition No. 823 of 1973 on 6-2-1973, contending inter alia that during the recent agitation for a separate Andhra State, curfew was imposed in the Town of Vijayawada from 6-1-1973 to 10-1-1973 and later on from 21-1-1973 to 24-1-1973 at specified hours. He therefore alleged that the imposition of curfew was without the authority of law and that the District Magistrate, Krishna very arbitrarily, capriciously and without following the procedure of law ordered the imposition of curfew which has disastrous consequences. It was therefore prayed that a declaration be made that the orders of curfew on the above dates issued by the District Magistrate. Krishna are without the authority of law, illegal and unconstitutional.

( 3 ) PENDING the writ petition, W. P. M. P. No. 1012 of 1973 for restraining the District Magistrate from imposing curfew was sought. This Court, however although admitted the writ petition for hearing, directed notice to be given, No interim direction, however, was issued.

(









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top