SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(AP) 174

A.V.KRISHNA RAO
K. Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


M. KRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Full Bench has been constituted in view of the fact that the Division Bench consisting of Narasimham, J. , ( as he then was ) and Parthasarathi, J. , before whom the above appeal came up for hearing, disagreed with the view expressed by another Division Bench ( Obul Reddy and Madhava Reddy, JJ.) in Writ Petitions Nos. 1140 and 1141 of 1965 ( Andh Pra ) ( judgment dated 13-10-1969 ).

( 2 ) THE appellant herein is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 746 of 1965. The Writ Petition was filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of prohibition restraining the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings from continuing the enquiry against the petitioner in D. E. No. 29 of 1964 on its file and for a consequential order to drop the proceedings.

( 3 ) WHEN the appellant was serving as Police Sub-Inspector, he received an order dated 9-5-1964 from the Superintendent of Police placing him under suspension. On 10-7-1964 charges were framed by the Disciplinary Tribunal in D. E. No. 29 of 1964. On 16-7-1964 the Government issued G. O. Ms. No. 233, directing that all those whose services were extended beyond the date of their superannuation for the p







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top