SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(AP) 101

A.GOPAL RAO, A.V.KRISHNA RAO, V.MADHAVA RAO
Kottu Kanna Rao – Appellant
Versus
District Registrar of Assurances and Collector – Respondent


EKBOTE, C. J.

( 1 ) THE document marked P-2 executed in 1968 was presented for registration before the Sub-Registrar , Bhimavaram on 7. 3. 1968 by the executants. The document calls itself a sale deed. It is drawn up on stamp papers of value of Rs. 6,525. 00. The Sub-Registrar, Bhimavaram, before whom this document was presented for registration entertained a doubt about the exact stamp duty payable on the document. He therefore made a reference to the District Registrar of Assurances, Eluru. The district registers held that the said document to be a sale for consideration of Rs. 1,44,444. 44 chargeable with a stamp duty of Rs. 6,525. 00 under Art. 20 of Schedule 1-A of the Indian Stamp act. He was also of the opinion that a transfer duty of Rs. 7,222. 20 is payable under Section 120 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities act, 1965.

( 2 ) AS the document was insufficiently stamped it was impounded by the Sub-Registrar and the District Registrar, Eluru, as Collector levied deficit stamp duty of Rs. 7,199. 70 and a penalty of Rs. 50. 30.

( 3 ) AGGRIEVED by that order Kottu Kanna rao, the purchaser preferred a revision petition to the Board of Revenue under section 56 (1) of the Indian




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top