SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(AP) 52

MADHAVA REDDY
Sanapala Krishna Morthy – Appellant
Versus
State represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, Srikakulam – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Criminal Revision Case is directed against an order of the learned 1st Class Magistrate, Ichapuram rejecting crl. M. P. No. 71 of 1970 for summoning other eye-witnesses to the incident in p. R. C. No. 1 of 1970 on his file.

( 2 ) P. WS. 1 and 2 who are said to be direct witnesses to the occurrence were examined and the accused wanted that the other so-called eye-witnesses also should be examined. That petition having been dismissed, they moved the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Additional district Magistrate, Srikakulam, to refer the matter to the High Court. That petition having been dismissed, they have filed this criminal revision case.

( 3 ) THE case against the six accused is for offences under sections 147, 323, Indian penal Code. It was originally taken up as calender case but was later converted into a P. R. C. proceeding. Among several eyewitnesses, two witnesses were examined. The learned Magistrate having found that the evidence of these two witnesses, who according to their statements, were present at the time of occunence, is supported by the wound certificate regarding injuries to P. W. 1 did not think it necessary in the interest of justice to exami



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top