SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(AP) 76

A.GOPAL RAO, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Chaganlal Vijayawargiya – Appellant
Versus
Astor Quisth – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THESE are the revision petitions filed against the order of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad made in I. A. Nos. 18888 to 1891 of 1970 in O. P. Nos. 291, 292, 297 and 298 of 1970 on 10/11/1970.

( 2 ) THE arterial facts are that the respondents herein made applications to the Chief Judge. City Civil Court, Hyderabad under Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (hereinafter called the Act) for appointing them as guardians alleging inter alia that after the custody of the children is given to them as guardians, they intended o adopt the children and act as foster parents.

( 3 ) AFTER the petitions were filed, it was published in The Hindu, calling for objections, if any, from persons interested in the children.

( 4 ) THE petitioner who is the Secretary Arya Prathinidhi Sabha. Hyderabad filed applications I. A. Nos. 888 to 1891 of 1970 requesting the Court to implead him as party to the petitions. He alleged that the Arya Prathinidhi Sabha runs regular homes for deserted children or for children who are either orphans or not claimed by parents. The Sabha bring them up in the regular Indian traditions. The petitioner also offered to take ca



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top