SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(AP) 91

A.GOPAL RAO, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Babballapati Kameswararao – Appellant
Versus
Kavuri Vesudevarao – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred (referred?) by K. Ramachandrarao, J. , as the learned Judge thought that the question which arises for consideration in the appeal is of considerable importance and is also likely to arises frequently. The question involves the interpretation of Section 15 (2) of the Hindu Succession Act, hereinafter called "the Act".

( 2 ) THE facts are very brief and are not in dispute. The property in question belonged to one K. Mahalakshmamma, wife of Ramakrishnayya. The plaintiff is the son of Janakiramaiah, the eldest brother of the said Ramakrishanayya. Mahalakshmamma died issue less. The plaintiff claims to be entitled to her properties. The 1st defendant is the paternal uncles son of Mahalakshmamma. The 2nd defendant is the brother-in-law of the 1st defendant. They have no manner of right in the suit properties. The suit was therefore originally laid for declaration of plaintiffs title and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession. It was subsequently altered to that of possession and mesne profits.

( 3 ) THE defendants set up a will executed by K. Mahalakshmamma dated 24-9-1961. They denie


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top