SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(AP) 128

RAMULU
K. Lakshminarasaiah – Appellant
Versus
R. Krishna – Respondent


RAMANUJULU NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition arises under the Andhra Pradesh buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act. The landlord is the Revision Petitioner.

( 2 ) THE material facts so far as they are relevant are stated below :- the respondent has been in occupation of a portion of the suit building as the petitioner s tenant on a monthly rent of Rs 18/- exclusive of electricity charges. The tenant fell into arears of rent for six months from June, to November, 1964 i. e. Rs. 18/- and electricity charges for three months, September, October and November, 1964. The petitioner filed an application before the Rent Controller for the eviction of the respondent on the ground that he was a wilful defaulter. In his counter the respondent raised two pleas. (1) The land-lord used to come and collect the rents once in six months or so at his convenience and the rent fell into arrears because of the landlord s failure to come and collect the rent. (2) He was suffering from severe chronic stomach ache and was not attending the shop.

( 3 ) IN view of those circumstances beyond his control, he informed the petitioner that he will pay the arrears after recovery of his health




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top