SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(AP) 118

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Chand Begum – Appellant
Versus
Hyderbaig – Respondent


O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Nizamabad under Sec. 438 Cr. P. C. Chand Begum, wife of Hyder Baig filed a petition under Sec. 488 Cr. P. C. against her husband claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 100/- per month. She alleged that her husband was always illtreating her, that she was compelled to file a petition for maintenance on an earlier occasion also and that her husband induced her to come back to him promising to treat her well but that he started illtreating her again. About three years prior to the filing of the petition he took her to the house oe her parents and left her there and did not care about her afterwards. He went to the length of foisting a false case of theft against her father and brothers; She also mentioned that the husband had married again. The husband admitted the second marriage. In the counter filed by the husband, while denying the allegations made by the wife he stated that his wife left his house of her own accord and that he was prepared to receive her back if she was willing to go and live with him. When the wife was examined as P. W; 1 she mentioned in her chief-examination that her husband had



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top