SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 16

C.V.RAMULU, GOPALRAO EKBOLE
K. A. Natesa Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Nune Krishniah Chetty – Respondent


GOPLARAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is from the judgment of our learned brother Obul Reddi J. given in Appeal No. 446 of 1961 on 1/08/1967 whereby the learned Judge allowed the appeal and dismissed the plaintiffs suits.

( 2 ) THE material facts in order to understand the arguments raised before us may briefly be stated. The plaintiff. who is the appellant before us, instituted O. S. No. 75 of 1960 alleging inter alia that out of his own earnings he advanced various sums of money to Rajeswari Amma, the 2nd defendant. He first advanced on 30-12-1942 a sum of Rs. 3,000 and the 2nd defendant executed a registered unufructuary mortage in favour of the plaintiff. Subsequently on 29-3-48 he advanced Rs. 3,000. 00. On 7-5-1950 he advanced Rs. 2,000. 00 and on 7--1951 advanced Rs. 2,000/- and for all the three loans, Rajeswari Ammal, the 2nd defendant, executed three mortgage deeds separately. The mortage deeds were taken in the name of the 3rd defendant. who is the wife of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was advised that the three simple mortgage deeds should not be taken in his own name as it might involve some complications. The plaintiff therefore took all the three deeds
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top