SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 21

A.GOPAL RAO, SRIRAMULU
Sathya Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by 19 petitioners praying for the issue of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order and to declare the existing seniority list of the Subordinate Judges in the Andhra Pradesh as invalid and to quash the said seniority list and to direct perpetration of a proper seniority list according to law showing the petitioners and senior to respondents 3 to 12.

( 2 ) THE facts necessary to appreciate the contentions raised before us may briefly be stated.

( 3 ) AS a consequence of the reorganization of States, Telengana area was joined of Andhra area forming the State of Andhra Pradesh. According to Section 115 of the States Reorganisation Act several of the personnel holding post of the Munsif-Magistrate in the former Hyderabad State Judicial service were allotted to the existing Andhra State Judicial Service. Consequent on such allocation, the question of their integration in Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service and the equation with their counterparts in the Andhra State Judicial Service, Viz. , District Munsifs, arose.

( 4 ) CERTAIN principles in respect of e








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top