P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU, S.OBUL REDDY
Indian Bank Ltd. , Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Anomula Seshagiri Rao and Sons Co. , Vijayawada – Respondent
( 1 ) TWO main questions arise in these two appeals preferred by the Indian Bank Ltd. , (hereinafter referred to as the appellant-Bank); (1) Whether the Memo, Ex. A- dated 21-4-1959, constituted mortgage by deposit of title deeds and (2) whether the 589 and odd caster seed bags pledged by the 1st defendant in O. S. 1/1961 belonged to the 3rd defendant-firm and whether the 1st defendant had no agency or power on behalf of the 3rd defendant to pledge the goods with the appellant-Bank. (Contd. on Column 2) 1. Open loan cash credit account
( 2 ) KEY loan cash credit account.
( 3 ) DOCUMENTARY bills purchasing account.
( 4 ) LEAN bills purchasing account. The total amount due from the 1st defendant on all the accounts is Rupees 1,16,419-71. In respect of the debt, he had deposited title deed under a letter, Ex. A-27. O. S. 1/61 was filed to recover the said amount not only from the 1st defendant but also from the 3rd defendant-firm as it claimed to be the owner of 589 bags of castor seeds pledged by the 1st defendant under Ex. A-28 dated 7-7-1960. 4. The 1st defendant, who filed his written statement and remained ex parte questioned the correctness of the accounts of the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.