SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 66

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU, S.OBUL REDDY
Indian Bank Ltd. , Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Anomula Seshagiri Rao and Sons Co. , Vijayawada – Respondent


OBUL REDDI, J.

( 1 ) TWO main questions arise in these two appeals preferred by the Indian Bank Ltd. , (hereinafter referred to as the appellant-Bank); (1) Whether the Memo, Ex. A- dated 21-4-1959, constituted mortgage by deposit of title deeds and (2) whether the 589 and odd caster seed bags pledged by the 1st defendant in O. S. 1/1961 belonged to the 3rd defendant-firm and whether the 1st defendant had no agency or power on behalf of the 3rd defendant to pledge the goods with the appellant-Bank. (Contd. on Column 2) 1. Open loan cash credit account

( 2 ) KEY loan cash credit account.

( 3 ) DOCUMENTARY bills purchasing account.

( 4 ) LEAN bills purchasing account. The total amount due from the 1st defendant on all the accounts is Rupees 1,16,419-71. In respect of the debt, he had deposited title deed under a letter, Ex. A-27. O. S. 1/61 was filed to recover the said amount not only from the 1st defendant but also from the 3rd defendant-firm as it claimed to be the owner of 589 bags of castor seeds pledged by the 1st defendant under Ex. A-28 dated 7-7-1960. 4. The 1st defendant, who filed his written statement and remained ex parte questioned the correctness of the accounts of the a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top