SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 56

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Mohana Rao – Appellant
Versus
Mogilisetti Srilakstmamma – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against an order dated 7-7-1969 of the court of the Addl. District Judge, krishna Machilipatnam passed in E. A. No. 54 of 1968 in O. S No. 9 of 1956 rejecting the amendment sought under Order 21 Rule 17 and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in E. A. No. 67 of 1963 in O. S. No. 9 of 1956 by incluiing the reliefs under Or. 21, Rules 21, 22, 54, 66 and 82 CPC for attachment and sale of some immoveable properties of the judgment debtors 3 to 7 in execution of the decree.

( 2 ) THE suit O. S No. 9 of 1956 was filed by the I st respondent herein against the respondents 2 to 10. Respondent No 2 was a firm of which respondents 3 to 10 were partners. The suit was decretd on 29-2-1956 for a sum of Rs. 11, 056-6-0. The 1st respondent filed e. P. No. 6 of 1956 and recovered a sum of Rs. 6,000/-, Thereafter the 1st respondent transferred the decree on 31-8-1953 in favour of the present petitioner. The petitioner then filed E. A. 67 of 1963 referred to above on 9-10-1968 for two reliefs namely (1) for recognition of his transfer urder Order 21 Rule 16 CPC; and (2) to transfer the decree for execution to the Sub-c













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top